Pages

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the users should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the users should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.


The growing density of cars call for road improvement scheme. While some people argue that it is the government’s responsibility to pay for road construction, I believe that car users should be charged for the service.

To start with, there are some arguments put forth in support of the government’s spending on road building and maintenance. First, an efficient road transport system plays a pivotal role in ensuring smooth traffic flow, giving a boost in trade activities within the country and economic growth at large.

For example, modern road infrastructure has a crucial part to play in the rapid development of major cities in the world such as New York or Paris. Furthermore, the convenience and safety of citizens should be of paramount concern of the authority. Therefore, each level of government is obliged by law to provide and maintain the national road network such as local roads, bridges or foot paths.

However, I strongly support the latter opinion that car commuters should cover the cost of road infrastructure. Compared to walking or cycling which leave little visual damage on road, cars definitely take up more space on city streets, and high demand for car use in everyday life causes road deterioration at an increasingly fast rate. For this reason, roadbuilding and expansion mostly facilitate drivers so that they can travel safely and smoothly. Besides, car owners normally have significantly higher income than others. Funding for new construction and repair, thus, is a form of lifting the financial burden on less fortunate ones in order that the community as a whole can enjoy a better living standard.

In conclusion, despite the fact that the government is responsible for national affairs in general including road construction, I reckon that it is moral and legal duty of car users to pay for their regular road use and support poor individuals.

See more: Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree? Whether the government budget should be invested in traffic infrastructure or public transport systems is open to debate.